Cuceu, A et al., Cosmology beyond BAO from the 3D distribution of the Lyman-alpha forest, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 506 (4): 5439-5450 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Manera, M et al., Obtaining nonlinear galaxy bias constraints from galaxy-lensing phase differences, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 506 (4): 5878-5887 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Cabayol, L et al., The PAU survey: Estimating galaxy photometry with deep learning, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 506 (3): 4048-4069 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Jeffrey, N et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Curved-sky weak lensing mass map reconstruction, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 505 (3): 4626-4645 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Soo, JYH et al., The PAU Survey: narrowband photometric redshifts using Gaussian processes, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 503 (3): 4118-4135 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Pedersen, C et al., An emulator for the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest in beyond-$\Lambda$CDM cosmologies, Journal Of Cosmology And Astroparticle Physics. (5): 33- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Turner, S et al., Synergies between low- and intermediate-redshift galaxy populations revealed with unsupervised machine learning, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 503 (2): 3010-3031 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Alarcon, A et al., The PAU Survey: An improved photo-z sample in the COSMOS field, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 501 (4): 6103-6122 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Vielzeuf, P et al., Dark energy survey year 1 results: The lensing imprint of cosmic voids on the cosmic microwave background, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 500 (1): 464-480 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Jiménez, J et al., Integration of a testbench for the optical and thermal characterization of near-infrared detectors used in ground and space-based astronomy, Ieee Transactions On Instrumentation And Measurement. 70 5006107- (2021)[DOI]
Tortorelli, L et al., The PAU survey: measurement of narrow-band galaxy properties with approximate bayesian computation, Journal Of Cosmology And Astroparticle Physics. (12): 13- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Gatti, M et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogue, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 504 (3): 4312-4336 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Alam, S et al., Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Physical Review d. 103 (8): 83533- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Ferrero, I et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy mock catalogs for BAO analysis, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 656 A106- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Friedrich, O et al., Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: covariance modelling and its impact on parameter estimation and quality of fit, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 508 (3): 3125-3165 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Adhikari, S et al., Probing Galaxy Evolution in Massive Clusters Using ACT and DES: Splashback as a Cosmic Clock, Astrophysical Journal Letters. 923 (1): 37- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Pocino, A et al., Euclid preparation XII. Optimizing the photometric sample of the Euclid survey for galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analyses, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 655 A44- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Cheng, TY et al., Galaxy morphological classification catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with convolutional neural networks, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 507 (3): 4425-4444 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Yu, ZF et al., OzDES Reverberation Mapping Programme: the first Mg II lags from 5 yr of monitoring, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 507 (3): 3771-3788 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Shin, T et al., The mass and galaxy distribution around SZ-selected clusters, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 507 (4): 5758-5779 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Bernardinelli, PH et al., C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein): The Nearly Spherical Cow of Comets, Astrophysical Journal Letters. 921 (2): L37- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Martinelli, M et al., Euclid: Constraining dark energy coupled to electromagnetism using astrophysical and laboratory data, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 654 A148- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Vega-Ferrero, J et al., Pushing automated morphological classifications to their limits with the Dark Energy Survey, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 506 (2): 1927-1943 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Wiseman, P et al., Rates and delay times of Type Ia supernovae in the Dark Energy Survey, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 506 (3): 3330-3348 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Fortino, WF et al., Reducing Ground-based Astrometric Errors with Gaia and Gaussian Processes, Astronomical Journal. 162 (3): 106- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Stanford, SA et al., Euclid Preparation. XIV. The Complete Calibration of the Color-Redshift Relation (C3R2) Survey: Data Release 3, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 256 (1): 9- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Munoz, AJ et al., Euclid: Estimation of the Impact of Correlated Readout Noise for Flux Measurements with the Euclid NISP Instrument, Publications Of The Astronomical Society Of The Pacific. 133 (1027): 94502-094502 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Davies, LJM et al., Deep Extragalactic VIsible Legacy Survey (DEVILS): consistent multiwavelength photometry for the DEVILS regions (COSMOS, XMMLSS, and ECDFS), Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 506 (1): 256-287 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Fumagalli, A et al., Euclid: Effects of sample covariance on the number counts of galaxy clusters, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 652 A21- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Lemos, P et al., Assessing tension metrics with dark energy survey and Planck data, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 505 (4): 6179-6194 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Andrade-Oliveira, F et al., Galaxy clustering in harmonic space from the dark energy survey year 1 data: compatibility with real-space results, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 505 (4): 5714-5724 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Cantu, SA et al., A Deeper Look at des Dwarf Galaxy Candidates: Grus i and Indus ii, Astrophysical Journal Letters. 916 (2): 81- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Abbott, TMC et al., The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 255 (2): 20- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Grayling, M et al., Understanding the extreme luminosity of DES14X2fna, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 505 (3): 3950-3967 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Myles, J et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: redshift calibration of the weak lensing source galaxies, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 505 (3): 4249-4277 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Vincenzi, M et al., The Dark Energy Survey supernova programme: modelling selection efficiency and observed core-collapse supernova contamination, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 505 (2): 2819-2839 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Knabenhans, M et al., Euclid preparation: IX. EuclidEmulator2-power spectrum emulation with massive neutrinos and self-consistent dark energy perturbations, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 505 (2): 2840-2869 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Chen, A et al., Constraints on dark matter to dark radiation conversion in the late universe with DES-Y1 and external data, Physical Review d. 103 (12): 123528- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Sevilla-Noarbe, I et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 254 (2): 24- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Grandis, S et al., Exploring the contamination of the DES-Y1 cluster sample with SPT-SZ selected clusters, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 504 (1): 1253-1272 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Inserra, C et al., The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 504 (2): 2535-2549 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Martinelli, M et al., Euclid: Impact of non-linear and baryonic feedback prescriptions on cosmological parameter estimation from weak lensing cosmic shear, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 649 A100- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Doux, C et al., Dark Energy Survey internal consistency tests of the joint cosmological probes analysis with posterior predictive distributions, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 503 (2): 2688-2705 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Doux, C et al., Consistency of cosmic shear analyses in harmonic and real space, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 503 (3): 3796-3817 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Koushan, S et al., GAMA/DEVILS: Constraining the cosmic star-formation history from improved measurements of the 0.3-2.2 micron Extragalactic Background Light, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 503 (2): 2033-2052 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
To, C et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances, Weak Lensing, and Galaxy Correlations, Physical Review Letters. 126 (14): 141301- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Manzoni, G et al., Modelling the quenching of star formation activity from the evolution of the colour-magnitude relation in VIPERS, New Astronomy. 84 101515- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Mucesh, S et al., A machine learning approach to galaxy properties: joint redshift-stellar mass probability distributions with Random Forest, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 502 (2): 2770-2786 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Huang, HJ et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 502 (4): 6010-6031 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Aguena, M et al., The WaZP galaxy cluster sample of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 502 (3): 4435-4456 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Stringer, KM et al., Identifying RR Lyrae Variable Stars in Six Years of the Dark Energy Survey, Astrophysical Journal Letters. 911 (2): 109-109 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Napier, KJ et al., No evidence for orbital clustering in the extreme trans-Neptunian objects, Planetary Science Journal. 2 (2): 59- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Ilbert, O et al., Euclid preparation: XI. Mean redshift determination from galaxy redshift probabilities for cosmic shear tomography, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 647 A117- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Renard, P et al., The PAU survey: Ly ? intensity mapping forecast, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 501 (3): 3883-3899 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Kelsey, L et al., The effect of environment on Type Ia supernovae in the Dark Energy Survey three-year cosmological sample, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 501 (4): 4861-4876 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Hilton, M et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of >4000 Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Galaxy Clusters, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 253 (1): 3- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Nadler, EO et al., Milky Way Satellite Census. III. Constraints on Dark Matter Properties from Observations of Milky Way Satellite Galaxies, Physical Review Letters. 126 (9): 91101- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Costanzi, M et al., Cosmological constraints from des Y1 cluster abundances and SPT multiwavelength data, Physical Review d. 103 (4): 43522- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Shajib, AJ et al., Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397), Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 501 (2): 2833-2835 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Tanoglidis, D et al., Shadows in the Dark: Low-surface-brightness Galaxies Discovered in the Dark Energy Survey, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 252 (2): 18- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Jarvis, M et al., Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: point spread function modelling, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 501 (1): 1282-1299 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Sampaio-Santos, H et al., Is diffuse intracluster light a good tracer of the galaxy cluster matter distribution?, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 501 (1): 1300-1315 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Porredon, A et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis, Physical Review d. 103 (4): 43503- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Muir, J et al., DES Y1 results: Splitting growth and geometry to test ΛcDM, Physical Review d. 103 (2): 23528- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Yang, Q et al., Spectral Variability of a Sample of Extreme Variability Quasars and Implications for the MgII Broad-line Region, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 493 (4): 5773-5787 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Mawdsley, B et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Wide Field Mass Maps via Forward Fitting in Harmonic Space, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 493 (4): 5662-5679 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Henghes, B et al., Machine Learning for Searching the Dark Energy Survey for Trans-Neptunian Objects, Publications Of The Astronomical Society Of The Pacific. 133 (1019): 14501- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Liao, WT et al., Discovery of a candidate binary supermassive black hole in a periodic quasar from circumbinary accretion variability, Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society. 500 (3): 4025-4041 (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]
Johnston, H et al., The PAU Survey: Intrinsic alignments and clustering of narrow-band photometric galaxies, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 646 A147- (2021)[DOI][ARXIV]